U.s. House Panel Oks Move to Give Congress Records of Fbi Probes Against Trump

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday unanimously approved a resolution directing the Justice Department to give Congress all records on FBI obstruction of justice or counterintelligence probes against President Donald Trump.

In a surprising show of bipartisanship, days after U.S. Attorney General William Barr told Congress he did not find an obstruction case against Trump, the Democratic-led panel voted 22-0 to send the measure to the full House of Representatives for a possible floor vote.

Full House approval would give Barr 14 days to comply with the demand for all records and communications concerning FBI investigations of Trump, as well any discussions within the Justice Department about secretly recording the president or seeking to replace him by invoking the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That amendment provides the procedures for replacing the president or vice president in the event of death, removal, resignation or incapacitation.

Lawmakers are looking specifically at obstruction of justice and counterintelligence probes that former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says he launched after Trump fired his predecessor, James Comey, in May 2017.

That effort was later superseded by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who last week concluded his investigation into possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. According to Barr's summary, Mueller found no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia but also did not exonerate the president on the question of obstruction.

McCabe has said that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein considered wearing a wire to secretly record conversations with Trump, an assertion that Rosenstein has denied. McCabe has also said there were discussions at the Justice Department about whether Cabinet members could remove the president under the 25th Amendment.

A Justice Department official declined to comment. A spokeswoman for McCabe declined to comment.

Democrats and Republicans are both determined to dig into the issue but for different reasons. Democrats hope to scrutinize early FBI evidence of obstruction by Trump, while Republicans expect to trace what they view as a possible anti-Trump conspiracy at the Justice Department.

"The Democrats may think there's something that will help them in the pursuit of trying to take out Trump. But to me, it may well prove to be evidence of treason at the Justice Department, trying to take out a president," said Representative Louie Gohmert, a committee Republican.

Democrats said they viewed Tuesday's resolution as a move to obtain Justice Department material that could also shed light on Mueller's findings and Barr's decision about obstruction.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat who has called on Barr to testify before his panel, described the vote as "a very modest step towards obtaining the information that Congress deserves - and requires - in order to do its job." On Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman, Lindsey Graham, called on Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate possible U.S. law enforcement missteps in their probe of Trump.

HOT PRODUCTS
pas de données
GET IN TOUCH WITH US
Articles recommandés
Abortion Argument Loud and Late
AUSTIN - Republicans and anti-abortion activists Tuesday tried to regain control of the contentious debate in the Legislature as a House panel heard passionate testimony late into the night on a sweeping package designed to limit the procedure.Just one day after an estimated 6,000 pro-abortion-rights activists turned the Legislature into a sea of orange, supporters of the anti-abortion legislation sported blue gear and turned out by the hundreds to pack the lower level of the Capitol.That's where the met Tuesday and by 10 p.m. had signed up about 1,000 to testify on 2, the catch-all proposal that critics say would effectively shutter the majority of the state's abortion clinics. The proposal also would ban abortions after 20 weeks.The committee planned to cut off testimony at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday, easily leaving hundreds without the opportunity to speak. It was uncertain at press time whether Republicans would vote on the bill once the hearing wrapped up."What we're going to do right now is get through the testimony," Rep. , who chairs the panel, said when asked about the timing of a vote.The Republican-led panel was expected to pass the bill out of committee so long as a quorum was maintained come midnight.If passed Tuesday or early Wednesday, it would tee up the proposal for debate in the House on July 9, which is when the lower chamber returns to work.Republicans in the Legislature are looking to move swiftly with the measure in the second attempt at passage.Gov. summoned lawmakers back to work after Republicans failed to pass an identical anti-abortion bill during the first special session. Passage this time around is likely, as Republicans have the votes and plenty of time.During Tuesday's hearing, dozens of women shared personal stories with lawmakers about their experiences with abortion. of San Antonio told the panel she felt like abortion was the only available route to pursue when she found out she was pregnant at 19 and dropped out of college. As a result, she planned on aborting her pregnancy until she had a change of heart."It would have been the easy thing to do to slide under the radar and have an abortion," Cornwell, 26 and teary eyed, said in front of the committee. "I feel fortunate to live in a state that stands with life."On the other end of the debate was , a 63-year-old Austin resident who had an abortion 30 years ago and said she didn't regret it. Already a single mother at the time, Conner said the procedure was "the right thing for me.""I would have been stuck with a baby (and nobody but me was) going to take care of her," she said.Although substantially fewer activists hit the Capitol on Tuesday, security stayed fortified with a presence of troopers. No arrests were reported as of 10 p.m.The theatrics also kept a steady pace. In a courtyard not far from where the House panel was debating, activists on both sides of the issue gathered to scream and chant for hours.Anti-abortion activists squeezed into a cramped hallway hours before a 3:30 start time for the hearing. Only a small batch - less than 100 - actually made it inside for the start of the hearing and witnesses were constantly rotated in and out of the room throughout the night. The rest were funneled into overflow rooms, which filled within minutes of opening.The crowd for the hearing waited hours, growing tired and tense early in the day. The Capitol hallway was hot, sweaty and stale."You're not running things. We are," a DPS trooper snapped at a woman trying to nudge forward in line.At the beginning of the hearing, Rep. , R-Parker, faced tough questions from .Rep. , D-Houston, pressed Laubenberg to accept changes to her bill to require the state to fund changes to clinics that conduct abortions so they can meet the higher standards set forth in her legislation."What happens if 37 clinics close" Turner asked."We're talking hypotheticals," Laubenberg responded, saying she doesn't believe her bill will cause clinics to shutter.Laubenberg later added: "My intent for this bill is for the health and safety of women."
IalHow Should We Defend Our Right?
Hi, Welcome to Kingwen Channel.Now the phenomenon of online shopping has become more and more common. Mars solar also display and sell residentials solar energy to the world via the Internet. Products in the process of transportation or use in the process sometimes will have problem. So how we can do to defend our right in residentials solar energy?Firstly, you need to find the factory supplier from Internet. And how can we identify trading companies and factories from the Alibaba or Ebay? In fact, It is easy.When you are browsing a supplier's product page for details, and you will see that some website picture and video looks so great and professional like some foreigner engineer are talking something in the office. But some video shows just factory working. So which one do you think is a trading company and which one is factory? The factory need to manufacture the residentials solar energy products and small profits and quick returns. They have no more money to spend on residentials solar energy product page optimization. They would like to pay more on manufacture.Secondly, Believe that you get what you pay. Some customers covet cheap to buy cheap but quality can not be guaranteed products. So once there's a quality problem you have to spend a lot more time and money on quality issues. What's more. Some household solar panels are made from second-hand materials. When the household solar panels once short circuit there will be fires and so on. That's not just a loss of money also endangers the safety of the family at any time.Thirdly, When your home solar panel system has problem or quality issue you should find your supplier first. Try to inform your supplier of home solar panel system quality problems by taking photos and videos. What better way to see the problem and figure out how to solve it than video.Hope you can buy the home solar panel system you like and cost-effective. Any question, please click and contact me.·RELATED QUESTIONWhat is process of import to led panels light?The process of importing LED panel lights begins by shortlisting companies that deal in top quality LED panel lights. Here's the list top 10 LED suppliers of China for help you with that,Top 10 LED manufacturers and suppliers in China - Top 10 ConsultantsNow that you are acquainted with top suppliers of LED lights, you need the know-how to select the best panel lights. Here's a blog that will help you with the selection and purchase of panel lights,How to Select and Buy LED Panel Lights? - Senior LEDI have studied LED market of China for around a year and they bring great value for money. If you want more insights about importing LED panel lights, purchasing in bulk or are even interested in checking out few samples, I highly recommend discussing your LED panel light queries by dropping an email hope this helps your search for best LED panel lights
Daniel Morgan Murder: Inquiry to Examine 'police Corruption'
An independent inquiry is to review the police handling of the unsolved murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan, the Home Office has announced.He was found with an axe in his head in a south London pub car park in 1987.An independent, judge-led panel of experts will now examine claims police corruption prevented a conviction, despite five investigations. Home Secretary Theresa May said the Hillsborough-style inquiry would "shine a light" on the case.Former Court of Appeal judge Sir Stanley Burnton will chair the independent panel, which will examine possible police involvement in the murder, allegations of police corruption during various investigations, and connections between private investigators, police officers and journalists - including those from the now-closed News of the World. The panel will have access to a vast archive of documents collected by police and will pass its findings to Mr Morgan's family before publishing a report.BBC home affairs correspondent Tom Symonds said its terms of reference were likely to focus on informing public understanding of the case, rather than re-investigating the evidence - although any new leads would be followed up by Scotland Yard. In a statement released on Friday, Mrs May acknowledged that there was "no likelihood of any successful prosecutions being brought in the foreseeable future", but that the Daniel Morgan independent panel would "shine a light" on the circumstances of his murder and the handling of the case.She stressed the Metropolitan Police had already "admitted that police corruption was a 'debilitating factor' in the original investigation"."Several criminal investigations failed to bring those responsible to justice and this independent panel will leave no stone unturned to find out why," she said."Importantly, the panel's work will put Mr Morgan's family at the centre of the process and the approach to this issue has the support of the MPS Commissioner and the Independent Police Complaints Commission.""The panel will utilise learning from the Hillsborough Independent Panel process in addressing how to approach its work," she added.Mr Morgan's family welcomed the move to investigate the handling of the case, which they said had been "crippled with corruption".His brother, Alastair, said the family had endured "nothing less than mental torture" in trying to bring this to light, adding: "Through almost three decades of public protests, meetings with police officers at the highest ranks, lobbying of politicians, and pleas to the media, we have found ourselves lied to, fobbed off, bullied, degraded and let down time and time again."He went on to say they had "witnessed a complete unwillingness by police and successive governments to face up to what was occurring, and ultimately a complete failure by police leadership to deal effectively with serious police criminality"."We trust and hope that the panel - through its examination and publication of all relevant material and information - will assist the authorities to confront and acknowledge this failure for once and for all, so that we may at last be able to get on with our lives," he said.Mr Morgan's family believe he was on the verge of exposing police corruption when he was murdered. Since then they have campaigned for whoever killed him to be brought to justice.The body of Mr Morgan, originally from Llanfrechfa, near Cwmbran, Torfaen, was found in Sydenham, south-east London, in 1987.A trial of four men charged with his murder in 2008 collapsed in 2011, following alleged failures by the police and prosecutors.Mr Morgan's mother Isobel Hulsmann, from Hay-on-Wye in Powys, met Mrs May at the end of 2011 to press the case.
Light Up Your Interior Office with Best LED Panel Lights
Give the interiors smooth and uniform lighting with LED Panel Lights by LEDMyplace Canada. These lights don't flicker or leave any dark spots around your area. The LED panel light fixtures match the warmth of your existing fluorescent fixtures and use only a fraction of energy for this. Designed to deliver breakthrough performance, it is easy to install into any drop ceiling/ suspended grid installation and is useful for both residential and commercial spaces. This 2X4 50W LED panel light can replace any 2X4 fluorescent fixture of up to 250W. Switch to enjoy bright light and don't forget to count your savings!These LED Panel lights are used in School Lighting , Conference Room Lighting , Hotel Lighting , Residential Suspended Grid Ceiling Lighting , Commercial Suspended Grid Ceiling Lighting , Hospital Lighting , Office Lighting , Supermarket Lighting. fmclassifieds.com/readad.php?m=12640300.·RELATED QUESTIONWhich LED panel has the best lumen?LED lighting's Luminosity depends on LED package technology. But for led package flux lm 80% decided by the chip, 10% decided by the phosphor, phosphor, glues and other material the remaining is determined by the packaging process. So the best lumen decided by the led package technology. Samsung, Epistar, Huga, etc both these brand has good technology of led package, most of quality led panelsuppliers are use this led chip to improve the lumens.Syhdeeis a professional led products manufacturer, mainly produceled tubes, led panel lights, led track light, etc
U.s. House Panel Oks Move to Give Congress Records of Fbi Probes Against Trump
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday unanimously approved a resolution directing the Justice Department to give Congress all records on FBI obstruction of justice or counterintelligence probes against President Donald Trump.In a surprising show of bipartisanship, days after U.S. Attorney General William Barr told Congress he did not find an obstruction case against Trump, the Democratic-led panel voted 22-0 to send the measure to the full House of Representatives for a possible floor vote.Full House approval would give Barr 14 days to comply with the demand for all records and communications concerning FBI investigations of Trump, as well any discussions within the Justice Department about secretly recording the president or seeking to replace him by invoking the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That amendment provides the procedures for replacing the president or vice president in the event of death, removal, resignation or incapacitation.Lawmakers are looking specifically at obstruction of justice and counterintelligence probes that former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says he launched after Trump fired his predecessor, James Comey, in May 2017.That effort was later superseded by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who last week concluded his investigation into possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. According to Barr's summary, Mueller found no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia but also did not exonerate the president on the question of obstruction.McCabe has said that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein considered wearing a wire to secretly record conversations with Trump, an assertion that Rosenstein has denied. McCabe has also said there were discussions at the Justice Department about whether Cabinet members could remove the president under the 25th Amendment.A Justice Department official declined to comment. A spokeswoman for McCabe declined to comment.Democrats and Republicans are both determined to dig into the issue but for different reasons. Democrats hope to scrutinize early FBI evidence of obstruction by Trump, while Republicans expect to trace what they view as a possible anti-Trump conspiracy at the Justice Department."The Democrats may think there's something that will help them in the pursuit of trying to take out Trump. But to me, it may well prove to be evidence of treason at the Justice Department, trying to take out a president," said Representative Louie Gohmert, a committee Republican.Democrats said they viewed Tuesday's resolution as a move to obtain Justice Department material that could also shed light on Mueller's findings and Barr's decision about obstruction.House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat who has called on Barr to testify before his panel, described the vote as "a very modest step towards obtaining the information that Congress deserves - and requires - in order to do its job." On Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman, Lindsey Graham, called on Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate possible U.S. law enforcement missteps in their probe of Trump.
Trump Jr. Strikes Deal with Senate Intelligence Committee for Additional Testimony
Donald Trump Jr. has reached a compromise with the Senate Intelligence Committee to testify before the panel, according to a source familiar with the negotiations. The deal comes less than a week after the committee's initial subpoena inflamed tensions between the GOP-led panel and the White House.The mid-June interview will be limited in time - no more than four hours - although no topics are off limits, the source said.The primary agenda is expected to focus on knowledge Trump Jr. may have about the proposed Trump Tower Moscow project as well as his involvement in a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in New York City with a Russian delegation after an offer of "dirt" on Hillary Clinton.A Senate Intelligence Committee spokesperson declined to comment.Trump Jr. first testified before the committee about such questions in December 2017. Negotiations over another appearance dragged on and eventually stalled, leading to the subpoena compelling the president's son to testify or risk being held in contempt.The debate over another round of testimony comes at a time when tensions are inflamed between President Trump and Capitol Hill over executive privilege - though most of that has centered on information the Democratic-controlled House is trying to obtain.In the Republican-controlled Senate, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has declared "case closed" on special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. The White House saw the findings as vindication.The report did not find conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia on election interference. And while the special counsel did not conclude one way or another whether the president obstructed justice, Attorney General William Barr has cleared the president on that question.But this latest request for testimony from Trump Jr. comes from one of the Senate's more bipartisan committees, and its chairman, North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, has seemed unmoved by any criticisms from within his party.Trump himself weighed in earlier Tuesday as he departed the White House for Louisiana, saying that it was "very unfair" how his eldest child was being treated."It's really a tough situation because my son spent I guess over 20 hours testifying about something that Mueller said was 100 percent OK," Trump told reporter. "And now they want him to testify again. I don't know why. I have no idea why. But it seems very unfair to me." Later on Tuesday, McConnell said, however, that it was the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman's prerogative on how to run his panel."None of us tell Chairman Burr how to run his committee," McConnell said. "I asked him to undertake this investigation on Russian collusion a couple of years ago. He's indicated publicly that he believes they will find no collusion and we are hoping to get a report on that subject very soon." But the Senate GOP leader declined to answer a question about whether he agreed with Trump's comments about the subpoena and repeated he expected to get the intelligence report soon.
Parliamentary Panels to Hear 'Padmavati' Issue
The two MPs wrote to the Committee last week that the "distortion" of history in the film could hurt sentiments of people in their Parliamentary seat and the Rajput community.Politics over '' is set to heat up as amid the raging controversy over the film, two Parliamentary panels headed by BJP MPs will hear the issue on Thursday.While the 30-member Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information and Technology chaired by Anurag Thakar has called Bhansali to hear his views on the matter, the 14-member Committee on Petitions chaired by Bhagat Singh Koshiyari will take a presentation from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting as two Lok Sabha MPs from the ruling party requested the panel to recommend a ban on the release of the film.Officials from I and B ministry will give back to back presentations to the two panels.The IT panel's meeting agenda is consideration and adoption of two draft action taken reports and briefing by the representatives of the I and B Ministry on the subject "Film Industry: Problems and Challenges". Thakur's panel has also called members from the Censor Board to discuss Bhansali's film.It is not yet clear whether Bhansali, who has been invited to present his views will appear before the panel or not.After a storm over alleged distortion of history in the film, the issue has led to a face off between the proponents and opponents of the movie and kicked in a debate about freedom of expression.Koshiyari-led panel will take the ministry's briefing on the representation of Chittorgarh MP CP Joshi and Kota-Bundi MP Om Birla (both from BJP) regarding their request to impose a ban on the release of the film. The two MPs wrote to the Committee last week that the "distortion" of history in the film could hurt sentiments of people in their Parliamentary seat and the Rajput community.
Gen. Melvin J. Maas, 65, Dies; Led Panel for the Handicapped; Blind Marine, Exmember of House, Heade
APRIL 14, 1964 This is a digitized version of an article from The Times's print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them. Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems. Please send reports of such problems to . WASHINGTON, April 13 (AP)-Maj. Gen. Melvin J. Maas, Marine Corps veteran, former Minnesota Congressman and chairman of the President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped, died today at the Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Md. He was 65 years old.General Maas had been blind since 1951, a result of facial wounds he suffered on Okinawa in World War II. He was afflicted with arthritis diabetes, ulcers and a heart ailment but nevertheless traveled during 10 years as chairman of the Presidential committee hundreds of thousands of miles by himself, urging equal employment opportunities for the handicapped.He said recently:"A handicapped person who lives up to his potential leads a more successful life than the so‐called normal person who uses only 50 per cent of his capabilities."During his long career in the Marine Corps and in the House of Representatives, as well as in his private life, General Maas often displayed his personal courage and won a reputation as a man who said what he thought, no matter what the consequences.AdvertisementHe almost became an Army officer. In 1917, even though he had received an appointment to the United States Military Academy, he was so eager to get into the war that he enlisted as a private in the Marine Corps. He did not see combat during World War I, but he did learn to fly and he began forming some definite ideas about the role of airpower in modern warfare.AdvertisementAfter the war, the future general completed his education at St. Thomas College, St. Paul, and the University of Minnesota. He prospected for oil in the Southwest for a few years, worked at various jobs and finally founded an insurance business in St. Paul.In 1926, he decided to campaign as the Republican candidate for the House of Representatives from Minnesota's Fourth District.After being elected in a fourman race, General Maas was appointed to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and from that position he began promoting measures to increase America's air power. He was a harsh critic of the nation's defense posture.In 1929, to demonstrate Washington's lack of proper air defense, the young Congressman rented a biplane and puzzed the Capitol, where a joint session of Congress was in session."People said that no plane could get within 10 miles of the Capitol. I wanted to show that one bomb could wipe out the entire Government," he said afterward.By 1932, other members of Congress were paying more attention to General Maas and his attacks on America's lack of preparedness in the face of growing unrest in Europe. The same year, General Maas had a chance to display his courage nn the flnnr of the House.One day while General Maas was addressing the House, a mentally deranged man in the spectators gallery rose to his feet brandishing a gun and demanded that he be allowed to address the House for 20minutes on some personal business.AdvertisementGeneral Maas shouted to the man that no one was allowed to address the House while carrying a gun. He ordered the man to throw him the weapon. The man did and was overpowered by security guards.The general's coolness in that incident won him the Carnegie Medal.He was defeated in the Democratic landslide of 1932 but returned to the House two years later and was re‐elected for four more terms.General Maas had been commissioned in the Marine Corps Reserve in 1925. He was a reserve colonel at the outbreak of World War II and upon his request was placed on active duty.He won the Legion of Merit and the Silver Star and received the Purple Heart during campaigns in the South Pacific. In 1945 he was wounded by enemy bomb fragments. These wounds caused his blindness.He nevertheless returned to active duty during the Korean war as a member of the Reserve Force Policy Board. When another general once remarked that General Maas was probably the only blind general who had ever served on active duty, he quipped:"Oh no, General, only the first to admit it."During General MlMaas'schairmanship of the President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped, educational and promotional efforts were increased and the committee expanded its functions to help the mentally ill and the mentally retarded find employment.General Maas is survived by his widow, Katherine; their son, Joseph, and three daughters of the general's first marriage, Patricia, a major in the Women's Marine Corps, Mrs.Anthony C. Martino and Mrs.Leo Catteron.A version of this archives appears in print on April 14, 1964, on Page 37 of the New York edition with the headline: Gen. Melvin J. Maas, 65, Dies; Led Panel for the Handicapped; Blind Marine, Ex‐Member of House, Headed President's Committee for 10 Years. Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe
U.S. House Panel OKs Move to Give Congress Records of FBI Probes Against Trump
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday unanimously approved a resolution directing the Justice Department to give Congress all records on FBI obstruction of justice or counterintelligence probes against President Donald Trump. In a surprising show of bipartisanship, days after U.S. Attorney General William Barr told Congress he did not find an obstruction case against Trump, the Democratic-led panel voted 22-0 to send the measure to the full House of Representatives for a possible floor vote. Full House approval would give Barr 14 days to comply with the demand for all records and communications concerning FBI investigations of Trump, as well any discussions within the Justice Department about secretly recording the president or seeking to replace him by invoking the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. That amendment provides the procedures for replacing the president or vice president in the event of death, removal, resignation or incapacitation. Lawmakers are looking specifically at obstruction of justice and counterintelligence probes that former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe says he launched after Trump fired his predecessor, James Comey, in May 2017. That effort was later superseded by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who last week concluded his investigation into possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. According to Barr's summary, Mueller found no evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia but also did not exonerate the president on the question of obstruction. McCabe has said that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein considered wearing a wire to secretly record conversations with Trump, an assertion that Rosenstein has denied. McCabe has also said there were discussions at the Justice Department about whether Cabinet members could remove the president under the 25th Amendment. A Justice Department official declined to comment. A spokeswoman for McCabe declined to comment. Democrats and Republicans are both determined to dig into the issue but for different reasons. Democrats hope to scrutinize early FBI evidence of obstruction by Trump, while Republicans expect to trace what they view as a possible anti-Trump conspiracy at the Justice Department. "The Democrats may think there's something that will help them in the pursuit of trying to take out Trump. But to me, it may well prove to be evidence of treason at the Justice Department, trying to take out a president," said Representative Louie Gohmert, a committee Republican. Democrats said they viewed Tuesday's resolution as a move to obtain Justice Department material that could also shed light on Mueller's findings and Barr's decision about obstruction. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat who has called on Barr to testify before his panel, described the vote as "a very modest step towards obtaining the information that Congress deserves - and requires - in order to do its job." On Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman, Lindsey Graham, called on Barr to appoint a special counsel to investigate possible U.S. law enforcement missteps in their probe of Trump.
Chinese Government Assists Dominica with 2,500 Solar Street Light with Battery and Panel
The Minister of Public Works of the Dominican Republic, Blackmer, said that the Dominican solar street light with battery and panel project, which was assisted by the Chinese government, was being implemented smoothly.The solar street light with battery and panel project has a construction period of 33 months and a total investment of US $ 34 million. It is planned to install 4,851 solar street light with battery and panel on major roads nationwide, of which 2,500 solar street light with battery and panel will be provided by China.·RELATED QUESTIONWhat is the cheapest LED panel light?I am certain that by the cheapest you mean LED lights that are super affordable and insanely inexpensive. Frankly, I think LED lights must be chosen on the basis of features and qualities like longer lifespan, eco-friendliness, energy-efficiency etc. Pricing comes later on. To buy such LED lights, you don't have to go through the tiring process of searching quality panel lights on online marketplaces like Amazon, eBay & Alibaba (it's really hard to find quality LED products on Amazon & eBay, these days), you just need to find a trusted LED lighting manufacturer & supplier.Talk about the cheap LED products, since they are made keeping cost-cutting in mind and do not run for long, you should refrain buying them in the first place. I was also going to make the same mistake while searching for LED panel lights for my commercial warehouse located at Denver, Colorado but then a friend showed me the right direction and suggested me to buy top-quality yet inexpensiveLED panel lightsfrom SeniorLED. The brand is a pioneer in the commercial LED lighting space. They develop & supply high-performing and best-in-class commercial LED lights to business units, corporations, and commercial warehouses across the globe.I placed a bulk order of 150 LED panel lights for my warehouse and got a huge discount on that. The product quality and features are amazing. The best thing I found in SeniorLED's LED panel lights is that they light up the big space in a go and do not flicker a bit. I am completely satisfied with the product quality and the price they come with.Below are the features that I liked the most about the company and its products:All products come with AIG Liability InsuranceThe company is highly innovation-driven and constantly focuses on developing healthy lighting and modern LED lighting productsTheir LED lighting products come with international safety and quality certificationsThe brand has a global network of LED lighting distributorsReplacement for damaged goods without the necessity of sending back damaged goods. (I like this one more)The brand is an established name with over a decade of experience in the lighting industry.Super affordable pricing of LED productsLooking for water-resistant LED panel lights? Then, don't forget to check out this latest news based onadvanced waterproof LED panel lights.Here's another Quora answer written by a customer that praises the brand's LED lighting features and after-sales supportThank you!.
pas de données

Copyright © 2020  Shandong Abusair Agricultural Machinery Co,. Ltd- |  Sitemap

Multifunctional farm Abusair machinery  |  Tea Professional Cultivator farm machinery